Federal Judge Alison Nathan ruled earlier this week in a preliminary order that Gawker had the right to delete the information from court filings.
But Nahan withheld final judgment and warned the Web site that she may “revisit” her decision. If she determines the information is “subject to a heightened presumption of access” it could become public.
A large number of visitors add their own snarky comments, usually anonymously, to various Gawker posts. If the ruling ultimately goes against Gawker, their real names, email addresses and other personal info could become public.
They’ll be outed in front of the bosses and colleagues they likely made fun of.
Ex-Gawker interns Aulistar Mark and Andrew Hudson filed the unfair labor practices lawsuit two years ago in Federal District Court in Manhattan. The case was expanded to a class action including all interns last year.
The interns reportedly support Gawker’s move to protect the info, according to Courthouse News Service. Gawker lawyer Mark Batten told the Web site the information only includes personal (non-Gawker) email addresses, almost all of which belong to “third parties, and passwords.”
“We have not asked that any substantive information be sealed, on any subject,” he said.
Gawker’s owner Nick Denton pioneered Internet snark. At the same time, he has been scored for exploiting employees, interns and freelancers. His sites, meanwhile, have gone through periods of sudden, convulsive layoffs.
Earlier this month, Denton announced that he was consolidating his Web properties and focusing on politics and technology, according to several reports. A new round of layoffs followed.
Noted sites, such as Defamer and Valley Wag are being shuttered. There are no plans to drop it satirical approach and tone to news coverage.
Let us know your thoughts and be sure to follow IM on Twitter for the latest media news.