Billboard’s Fate Uncertain as Investors Sour on Direction

Billboard, the so-called Bible of the music industry, is reportedly facing steep cutbacks as investors sour on the direction of the publication and its prospects in the troubled economy.

The publication, which has tried to create at least a perception of success since its latest owners Prometheus Media Group took over, has never been able to overcome its fundamental problem.

Back in the day, Billboard’s strength was its ability to reach tens of thousands of record store owners, at a time when independent record stores ruled the retail landscape.

It was the most efficient way for record labels to market to store owners who made buying decisions about records.

But that business model is largely dead and has been for years. As Billboard’s record store audience dwindled, so did its fortunes.

Record labels now market directly to the top 10 or so retail outlets that sell the lion’s share of CDs, and even the big retailers are now under pressure from digital music sales.

Yet, Billboard continues to beat the same old business model.

What’s worse, it’s devolved into nothing more than a high-priced fanzine.

The predicament is unsurprising since Editorial Director Bill Werde has a limited fan magazine background.

Billboard Editor Danyel Smith, formerly the editor of Vibe, another consumer magazine, suffers from the same shortcoming.

Werde’s boss, Richard Beckman comes from a consumer magazine background at Conde Nast. The last time Conde Nast tried its hand at a business magazine, Portfolio, it flopped miserably.

In the last decade, Keith Girard was the first and only Billboard editor-in-chief who had a business and trade magazine background.

After the death of long-time editor Tim White, then-owner VNU searched for almost a year before reaching outside the music industry to Girard, who had successfully turned around two other business publications.

Not surprisingly, he met fierce staff opposition when he tried to redirect the publication.

Yet much of the change that has taken place began under his tenure, including refocusing billboard.com a consumer site and creating billboard.biz, a site especially tailored for the business audience.

He began serious coverage of the legal and management side of the industry and also launched a music legal and management web site.

He was also the only editor, before or since, who was able to meet the standards of the American Bar Association for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credits for Billboard’s Music & Money Conference.

It was not only a strong endorsement of the quality of the programming, but it made the conference a must-attend event for industry lawyers and management.

He launched Billboard’s coverage of digital music, music and fashion, increased coverage of business issues, expanded Washington coverage and strengthened Billboard’s editorial voice.

He created the magazine’s touring conference and established, or re-established strategic relationships with the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, producer of the Grammys, the Rock ‘n Roll Hall of Fame and Rolling Stone magazine.

In addition, he reorganized the staff, increased minority hiring and cut more than $1 million in editorial costs while expanding coverage.

But since his departure, those initiatives have languished, either through a lack of vision or lack business journalism expertise.

Now some music executives fear the worst. Billboard may be “on the verge of economic collapse,” according to Paul Resnick, writing in Digital Music News, an online industry site.

The situation is “difficult to gauge,” he writes. “But reports from the inside suggest an uncertain climate, with considerable anxiety over future direction.”

“That includes a possible hiring and spending freeze, according to a separate source.”

Beckman has already reportedly been kicked upstairs and no longer is managing the turnaround, largely because his effort to turnaround sister publication The Hollywood Reporter, has “tanked,” he writes, citing a source.

“But the most serious problem is that investors apparently want out, and are losing patience with the plan.”

“They bought these properties and now there’s serious buyer’s remorse,” another executive close to the acquisition told the Web site.

“It’s the same old economic cocktail of woe, though this time, worsening advertising, subscription, industry, and macro-economic elements could be coming to a head.”

0 thoughts on “Billboard’s Fate Uncertain as Investors Sour on Direction

  1. Billboard is and has been the bible of the Industry forever; I guess with all the competition, and what sounds like bad or poor management, it’s going in the direction of the Industry it’s self.
    I truly hope they rebound from this, I look forward to Billboard news and wonderful content.
    Who am I? The Silver Conductor

    Remember:”Always know who loves you”
    The Silver Conductor

  2. Whatever Billboard’s current shortcoming, it’s preposterous to suggest that Keith Girard accomplished all that much. His tenure was marked by rancor and discontent from the staff more so because he never came to terms with understanding the music business.

    I dare the writer to put their name to this article.

    There may be many sides to the truth but this was stretches the truth…..by a country milee.

  3. Say what you will about Keith Girard, but he accomplished all of that and more. Plus he was a real journalist, having worked for the Washington Post as a reporter before becoming an editor. Billboard and the Hollywood Reporter, and Variety, for that matter, represented the worst in trade journalism. How do you think Nikki Finke was able to single-handedly kill THR and Variety? Through hard-nosed reporting without fear or favor — not something THR or Billboard were known for.

    Tim White was all about promoting artists — artists he liked, that is– not covering news. He refused to even cover rap and hip hop, or other emerging artists. I distinctly recall Girard putting Lil’ Kim on the cover of Billboard not long after he got there. That never would have happened under White. The magazine also did major front page pieces on Jay-Z and Fifty Cent, which never would have seen the light of day before.

    I know Girard went with Rashaun Hall to Detroit to meet personally with Eminem to assure him that Billboard would cover his music fairly. Em hated Tim White so much and thought the paper was so racist, he included White in the lyrics of one of his raps. It wasn’t pretty.

    Girard also personally met with Jann Wenner and convinced him to add Billboard Chart info back in the magazine. At the time, Rolling Stone had stopped running Billboard chart data was using data from Hits because Wenner and White were feuding. Billboard’s brand is still represented there.

    In many ways, Billboard has come a long way. But nearly all of it began with Girard. There was definitely a clash of newsroom cultures. Billboard reporters had a great passion for music and a strong sense of entitlement. But they were fanzine writers, not business journalists.

    Would Billboard be in the same predicament as it is today, if Girard had stayed? Hard to say. The music industry and the economy are a difficult environment for any publication. But it definitely would be a different magazine.

    In fact, I understand Girard is about to launch a music Web site that will compete with Billboard, much they way Finke took on THR and Variety. It bodes well for the industry, if not Billboard. There’s a void that needs to be filled.

  4. As I recall, Larry LeBlanc was a freelancer for Billboard, who lived in Canada, and rarely if ever set foot in Billboard’s offices. Not like you would know, Larry, you weren’t exactly there…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.